WalterGR
(a blog)
Thursday, June 07, 2007
  Heard around the Open Source watercooler

Me:
I'm eager to get started, but I have many questions first. Most deal with parts of the manual that didn't have specific details. <snip>
Response:
Be brave! Just install [it] and play with it. Half of your questions will answer them self.
Me, about another project:
Are the handbooks considered the definitive documentation? I'm finding that they leave out many details. Can these details be found somewhere that I'm not looking? For example: <snip>... Looking on Amazon, the only book with decent reviews is Pro [Subject] Development, which I just purchased. It talks about the "guts" of [Subject] and how to extend them... What bridges the gap between the Handbooks and books such as this?
Response:
<snip>...you should read the code, and the code documentation... again, reading the actual code, and the comments ([Subject] code is commented nicely) in the code.
(later...)
I don't believe there are any gaps between the information found in the handbooks and the Pro [Subject] Development book.
o_O
Comments

Post a Comment
Trackbacks

Create a Link



<< Home
Walter muses about running a website empire, technology, &c.

Editor of The Online Slang Dictionary, StreetReviewer, and Overheard in Sac.

Feed me XML.
E-mail me: waltergr, gmail.com

People I know

/ I Wish I Were a Japanese Schoolgirl
/ If I wanted you to know...
/ Life is pretty neat
/ nawl
/ Paul Paradise
/ the robots

People I don't know

/ Don Box's Spoutlet
/ Joel on Software
/ The Old New Thing

Things I read

/ Worse Than Failure
/ Lambda the Ultimate
/ OSNews

Recent works

/ No rest for the wicked
/ My newest project - StreetReviewer.com
/ Moving time
/ On focus
/ Cool Tools - MusicBrainz Tagger
/ On diction (...on Dancer, on Prancer, on Vixen)
/ Are you friendly?
/ Wait, you don't have to do pay-per-view?
/ Expanding my real estate empire
/ It's simple algebra, really

My corpus

α / February 2005 / March 2005 / November 2005 / June 2007 / July 2008 / ω